Comment 6 for bug 2055837

Revision history for this message
In , Simon Chopin (schopin) wrote :

FWIW, we've actually seen at least one package seemingly failing to build because of this issue:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/720254657/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.libflorist_2022.0.1~20220616-5_BUILDING.txt.gz

> posix-c.ads:876:07: error: size for "suseconds_t" too small, minimum allowed is 64

I didn't dig into what exactly they're doing there.