GLibC

  1. Bug #1757517
  2. Comment #53

Comment 53 for bug 1757517

Revision history for this message
In , Carlos-0 (carlos-0) wrote :

(In reply to Wang Liushuai from comment #48)
> Hi guys,
>
> In ByteDance, we hit this Glibc bug twice in real-world production and
> adopted the fix based on the OpenJDK solution. However, these temporary
> fixes are not extensible. In the end, it needs to be fixed on the Glibc side.

Thanks for that data point. It helps me prioritize this.