Comment 3 for bug 1625075

dharinic has offered to help out with this bug. I've assigned it to her and will be available for further input as required. Unfortunately, I don't have much time to look into it first hand.

NOTES:

1. Please keep updating the status as we progress and more information is obtained.
2. We are seriously considering it for Newton. But we need some answer/clarity on the situation by EOD today to see if we can ask exception in requirements for bump.
3. Otherwise, we will have to backport it to stable/newton and create a release out of it. This won't reflect the requirements but a good release note on the patch should give indication to the operators to keep their store updated in case of multi-tenant.
4. I've marked it as critical as it affects a foundational/primary functionality but TBH this is narrow scoped to only one type of store driver so I'm considering it for Newton requirements bump only based on Stuart's comment for good faith. Ideal scenario is still backport that may take it's own time :|