Comment 1 for bug 1511061
Revision history for this message
| Nikhil Komawar (nikhil-komawar) wrote | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
1. I agree, the image deletion operation should be atomic.
2. Image data left behind means there is a potential risk of filling up storage quota and resulting into a DoS; be mindful that it's a denial of service but NOT a exploit as it is dependent on the operators' failure scenarios of g-api <-> reg communication.
3. The original description has information related to failure scenarios for only v1. So, a check is needed for the v2 as applicable.