On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Brian Waldon
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Jay: I don't really want to code real 300-handling into glance client.
> It should only know how to speak one major (possibly minor) version of
> the api. The only 300 handling I would want to do is to present it as a
> client-side error (requesting an unsupported version).
That's fine. What it should NOT do is what it currently does and
return a 400 Bad Request :)
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Brian Waldon
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Jay: I don't really want to code real 300-handling into glance client.
> It should only know how to speak one major (possibly minor) version of
> the api. The only 300 handling I would want to do is to present it as a
> client-side error (requesting an unsupported version).
That's fine. What it should NOT do is what it currently does and
return a 400 Bad Request :)
-jay