@danms: yea i meant that we need to record the original format. But yes, i agree that this is a lot larger.
@kgarloff #160: fine with me as well, yes it is only billing and potentially capacity planning issue
@kgarloff #161: if you include #154 then at least i could not find any more exploitable path
@danms: yea i meant that we need to record the original format. But yes, i agree that this is a lot larger.
@kgarloff #160: fine with me as well, yes it is only billing and potentially capacity planning issue
@kgarloff #161: if you include #154 then at least i could not find any more exploitable path