Comment 24 for bug 1545092

Revision history for this message
Nikhil Komawar (nikhil-komawar) wrote :

Thanks for your response Brian.

The risk you mention is more than merely creating the image records for sure. I think the image record creation is already a known issue to be simply a nuisance at this point however, combined with the image properties and members could be seen as a issue. Nevertheless, I do feel that the list response can be handled by fine tuning pagination to ensure slowness is not significant.

The issue of DB to be filled with useless records is something that production clouds should carefully consider when choosing the size of the DB server.

Yes, the quota work isn't planned for Newton and is likely to not begin to materialize until Ocata. So, the rate limiting solutions and the size of DB server are some of the recommendations that can be given as a part of the security notice.

Overall, I think we have a good direction and set of small recommendations to make this a public discussion.