Comment 20 for bug 1545092

I agree with recommending deployers to always use a rate limit.

My concern about 244573 is basically what Fei Long said on PS 18. The tenant that owns the public images for the cloud may need to have an extremely high image quota, and with 244573 the only way that tenant can have a high enough quota is for everyone else to also have that same high quota. So I'm not sure that 244573 will really help ... we need a real quota system. On the other hand, 244573 is better than nothing, and deployers could also drop the max properties/tags/members allowed on images to limit the amount of junk a single user could stuff into the database. On the third hand, I'm thinking that a very low rate limit by itself might do the trick here, and if we're going to do quotas in Newton, then maybe 244573 isn't going to be very useful.

That's probably no help at all. I'll have to think some more.