Comment 3 for bug 1054933

Revision history for this message
Brian Aker (brianaker) wrote : Re: [Bug 1054933] Re: Memory Leak with MultiThread option

Hi,

Is the work being processed?

Cheers,
 -Brian

On Sep 23, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Ben <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> I can reproduce with a very simple test case.
>
> 1/ Start: gearmand -t 4
> 2/ In the directory "Sample" of the gearman distribution: I can find 2 binaries "reverse_worker" and "reverse_client_bg"
> 3/ I start reverse_worker
> 4/ Write a shell script Test.sh
> content of the shell script :1000 time the same command:
> reverse_client_bg aaabbbccc
> reverse_client_bg aaabbbccc
> reverse_client_bg aaabbbccc
> ....
> reverse_client_bg aaabbbccc
>
> 5/ Start he Test.sh
>
> Keep it running and after a while I can see the gearmand process memory
> increasing 4K by 4K.
>
> Let me know if I can help.
>
> Rgds
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> Gearman.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054933
>
> Title:
> Memory Leak with MultiThread option
>
> Status in Gearman Server and Client Libraries:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
>
> I was running Gearmand 0.14 till now. With the number of connected workers and Clients, I required to use the Threading option. (Option -t).
> Whatever if the number of Thread Started, I am facing to a Memory Leak in Gearmand process.
> It increases 4K by 4K....
>
> Also, I downloaded version 0.24, and I am still facing The same Memory
> Leak.
>
> Please Allow me to create a bug report, as I did additional testing on this one.
> You can simply use the Reverse_clientbg and reverse_worker delivered in the Sample package distribution.
>
> For information I am using LibEvent 1.4.14b-Stable distribution.
>
> Is it confirmed to be a bug?
>
> Best Regards
> -Ben.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/gearmand/+bug/1054933/+subscriptions