Comment 1 for bug 1007322

Hi Darren:

Thanks for the bug report, but I dont I understand what the problem is you are seeing.

Is your situation like this:

1-Job is submitted to worker
2-Worker starts execution of job
3-Worker is stopped while Job is still running

If that is the case, then the correct behavior would be what you are seeing. We should only send a job_completed packet if the job has finished. Stopping the worker does not mean the jobs itself has finished.

Or is the situation you are seing like the following:

1-Job is submitted to worker
2-Worker starts execution of job
3-Job completes
4-Worker is stopped