Comment 5 for bug 391385

Revision history for this message
chris mason (mason-christopher-thomas) wrote :

Hi,

Thanks for the response.

Isn't the binary packaging of a .deb file (including the .deb's list of dependencies) the responsibility of the individual distribution in question?

http://gcompris.net/ does not provide official Ubuntu .deb file downloads.

the source code .tar.gz at http://sourceforge.net/projects/gcompris/files/ does not have this bug.

Only the .deb from Ubuntu's repositories (and maybe Debian, I wouldn't know) has this bug.

How would it be gcompris' responsibility to correct a minor _packaging_ error on the part of Ubuntu with Ubuntu's gcompris .deb package?

...Well, I'll ask this since this is edging on territory I am unfamiliar with:

If I go ahead and take the five minutes to fix the .deb package so it correctly lists python-numeric as a depen, where would I go about submitting it?