Michael Hope <email address hidden> writes:
> Richard, Chung-Lin: could you follow up on this one please?
I think the status here is that we (Chung-Lin, Julian and myself)
have proposed three different patches on the list. They all work
around the underlying problem rather than fix it.
I was hoping the maintainers would pick one, but I suppose the
hackish nature of the patches means that no-one really wants to.
FWIW, I'm happy to defer to Chung-Lin's change for Linaro. I think
his patch has received the most testing and I agree it should be safe.
Michael Hope <email address hidden> writes:
> Richard, Chung-Lin: could you follow up on this one please?
I think the status here is that we (Chung-Lin, Julian and myself)
have proposed three different patches on the list. They all work
around the underlying problem rather than fix it.
I was hoping the maintainers would pick one, but I suppose the
hackish nature of the patches means that no-one really wants to.
FWIW, I'm happy to defer to Chung-Lin's change for Linaro. I think
his patch has received the most testing and I agree it should be safe.
Richard