My 2c: since ISO C says volatile bitfields are wrong, then if any code needs -fno-strict-volatile-bitfields to build, then either that code is wrong (which is not obviously true in this case--- but if is it true I would like to understand how so we can avoid it), or ... the compiler is wrong.
@Julian
My 2c: since ISO C says volatile bitfields are wrong, then if any code needs -fno-strict- volatile- bitfields to build, then either that code is wrong (which is not obviously true in this case--- but if is it true I would like to understand how so we can avoid it), or ... the compiler is wrong.
Am I being too naive?
Cheers
---Dave