I don't expect that pattern to match on 4.8 (the pattern is not canonical form), which is why this wasn't seen before.
If you can find a test-case that triggers on that branch, I'll do a back-port; otherwise, there's no point.
I don't expect that pattern to match on 4.8 (the pattern is not canonical form), which is why this wasn't seen before.
If you can find a test-case that triggers on that branch, I'll do a back-port; otherwise, there's no point.