Linaro GCC Tracking

  1. Bug #675347
  2. Comment #29

Comment 29 for bug 675347

Revision history for this message
Dave Martin (dave-martin-arm) wrote :

@Julian

My 2c: since ISO C says volatile bitfields are wrong, then if any code needs -fno-strict-volatile-bitfields to build, then either that code is wrong (which is not obviously true in this case--- but if is it true I would like to understand how so we can avoid it), or ... the compiler is wrong.

Am I being too naive?

Cheers
---Dave