This bug is not reproduced on ISO_195 (previous iso with OK status).
I've made a small comparison between packages in ISO_195 and ISO_197. Here is the results: http://paste.openstack.org/show/505587/
It's seems to me that this bug will not reproduce in future, because in ISO_197 not all dependency packages were built in.
This bug is not reproduced on ISO_195 (previous iso with OK status). paste.openstack .org/show/ 505587/
I've made a small comparison between packages in ISO_195 and ISO_197. Here is the results: http://
It's seems to me that this bug will not reproduce in future, because in ISO_197 not all dependency packages were built in.