>The test covers unsupported case "controller nodes have an additional 'ceph-osd' role"
from docs you mentioned I see that it's just "not recommended", but actually currently it's fully supported by Fuel, because I can assign 'ceph-osd' role to controllers via GUI/CLI/API without any limitations.
Anyway, I don't understand how assigning 'ceph-osd' role to controllers affects deployment process. Cluster wasn't under load (since it wasn't operational), according to atop logs Ceph didn't use a lot of resources.
@Bogdan,
>The test covers unsupported case "controller nodes have an additional 'ceph-osd' role"
from docs you mentioned I see that it's just "not recommended", but actually currently it's fully supported by Fuel, because I can assign 'ceph-osd' role to controllers via GUI/CLI/API without any limitations.
Anyway, I don't understand how assigning 'ceph-osd' role to controllers affects deployment process. Cluster wasn't under load (since it wasn't operational), according to atop logs Ceph didn't use a lot of resources.