Why you don't want to handle the same way in SIGTERM? AFAIU, Astute sends SIGTERM as universal signal to terminate something. It doesn't know about a lot of custom signals. I believe that fuel-agent should handle SIGTERM the same way it handles SIGINT.
Is there any reason why you think it shouldn't be this way?
@Alex,
Why you don't want to handle the same way in SIGTERM? AFAIU, Astute sends SIGTERM as universal signal to terminate something. It doesn't know about a lot of custom signals. I believe that fuel-agent should handle SIGTERM the same way it handles SIGINT.
Is there any reason why you think it shouldn't be this way?