Why don't reduce that to "{uid}" in 9.0? we have plenty of time. besides, I can't understand how "hostname" may affect you guys. Event if it's changed after deployment, astute.yaml will be regenerated according to that name. So it seems like a trying to fix not existed bug.
Why don't reduce that to "{uid}" in 9.0? we have plenty of time. besides, I can't understand how "hostname" may affect you guys. Event if it's changed after deployment, astute.yaml will be regenerated according to that name. So it seems like a trying to fix not existed bug.