jell, as i'm wroted above.
CentOS use CFQ by default. Ubuntu server - use deadline by default at lest three years.
So at this moment we have, that all ubuntu deployments use deadline and we don't have any problems with it's About performance of deadline vs cfq. You may to read this for example: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/Tuning_and_Optimizing_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_for_Oracle_9i_and_10g_Databases/
Load profile databases close enough to the load profile virtualization (many random access with random block size in many threads)
jell, as i'm wroted above.
CentOS use CFQ by default.
Ubuntu server - use deadline by default at lest three years.
So at this moment we have, that all ubuntu deployments use deadline and we don't have any problems with it's /access. redhat. com/documentati on/en-US/ Red_Hat_ Enterprise_ Linux/5/ html-single/ Tuning_ and_Optimizing_ Red_Hat_ Enterprise_ Linux_for_ Oracle_ 9i_and_ 10g_Databases/
About performance of deadline vs cfq. You may to read this for example:
https:/
Load profile databases close enough to the load profile virtualization (many random access with random block size in many threads)