> We agreed that bug scope is implemented. There is no need to allow user to change network names on UI.
Why so.. ?
Please see my original request in description:
> Let's come up with better naming. I can suggest the following:
> tenant_with_dhcp - private tenant network with DHCP enabled.
> external_no_dhcp - external network, no DHCP.
It would be ideal if user can define name in the UI which he/she likes better, but I'm fine if we just rename..
> We agreed that bug scope is implemented. There is no need to allow user to change network names on UI.
Why so.. ?
Please see my original request in description:
> Let's come up with better naming. I can suggest the following:
> tenant_with_dhcp - private tenant network with DHCP enabled.
> external_no_dhcp - external network, no DHCP.
It would be ideal if user can define name in the UI which he/she likes better, but I'm fine if we just rename..