Comment 15 for bug 1046337

Revision history for this message
Gerard (g-gorman) wrote :

Thanks Dale. The headache here is to create a minimum compile set that we can bundle up and send to Intel because of the dependency chain. The last time I did this I configured to disable PETSc modules and any other package I could, and then wrote a custom Makefile to build all source files which the target file (in this case Fields_Manipulation.F90) depends on. This gave me something I could tar up for Intel to test. If someone has time to have a go at doing this then let me know because it will be a few weeks before I'll have time to put effort into this again.