(In reply to Michael K. Edwards from comment #35)
> This updated patch isn't properly tested yet. I also didn't address Mike
> Hommey's comment, because I think it's safer to use __real_getaddrinfo() and
> thus require that direct users of getaddrinfo() use the --wrap flags.
> (Indirect users don't need them.)
There could be a concern if libmozutils was much bigger and was doing much more. Anyways, if ted is fine with that (i.e. using __real_getaddrinfo and --wrap flags), then so be it.
(In reply to Michael K. Edwards from comment #35) getaddrinfo( ) and
> This updated patch isn't properly tested yet. I also didn't address Mike
> Hommey's comment, because I think it's safer to use __real_
> thus require that direct users of getaddrinfo() use the --wrap flags.
> (Indirect users don't need them.)
There could be a concern if libmozutils was much bigger and was doing much more. Anyways, if ted is fine with that (i.e. using __real_getaddrinfo and --wrap flags), then so be it.