© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
> This is a new notification
Why are you assuming that no one else does TYPE_IMAGE content policy requests from an extension? It's a public API; anyone can do it.
I'm ok with breaking API compat for unfrozen APIs in a good cause, but this doesn't seem like such a cause (and is an abuse of the API no matter how one looks at it).
> Well, comment 103 happened.
I see nothing in that that would prevent a slightly modified version of the patch Dan was looking at (say modified to not copy/paste code and to make exceptions for URIs, not hostnames) from being acceptable to him.