Comment 481 for bug 269656

Tim Post wrote:
>
> So I dived into Google, which is ...u miss this kind of stuff? :)
>
> Friendly,
> --Tim
>

I think you should stop. What you say isn't going to help free software.
I respect Mark and I can't respect you. you seem so much ungrateful and
 respectless.

Mark shutellworh is a free software leader how is helping and promoting
free software. because of what he do people are liking GNU/Linux much
better. and if you closed your eyes you won't see the sun.

Who attacks any of the free software leaders is the real traitor. many
people dines The Biggest Truth, denying some one efforts is too much easier.

To MarK:

I tell you: have patience,, for lo! God loseth not the wages of the good.

About the bug:

Mozilla did great job making Firfox and they're not putting obstacles on
using their source code so they still doing a good job. and I don't see
why we can't use unbranded version. because what ever version why used
it still just a copy of Firfox and we are actually still using Mozilla
code. and we'll be grateful for Mozilla both way: branded or unbranded
version.

I'm with disabling the web service by default. but it would be nice if
Mozilla shows a warning of the danger that some one might get in if he
did not enable it. I think people read and understand don't they?

What ever Canonical comes out with we should keep in mind what it does
for free software. and we should respect their choice. even if we didn't
like it.