(In reply to comment #89)
> I believe this is a duplicate of bug 121498.
No; this proposes a more extensive solution. Solving this would solve that bug,
but the reverse is not necessarily true.
(In reply to comment #88)
> Other changes in 1.7 have broken web sites that I used in 1.6 without issues.
> The changes reference this as the "fix" for their breaking stuff, so I'd
> encourage those involved to fix this as soon as possible.
Brad Clarke, could you cite those changes/bugs, please?
(In reply to comment #89)
> I believe this is a duplicate of bug 121498.
No; this proposes a more extensive solution. Solving this would solve that bug,
but the reverse is not necessarily true.
(In reply to comment #88)
> Other changes in 1.7 have broken web sites that I used in 1.6 without issues.
> The changes reference this as the "fix" for their breaking stuff, so I'd
> encourage those involved to fix this as soon as possible.
Brad Clarke, could you cite those changes/bugs, please?