There is also a bit of discussion on changing the behaviour of fscrypt to use EXDEV instead:
https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/124
But why is Firefox using the /tmp folder in the first place, would it not be better to do a tmp file in the same folder to start with and then maybe fall back to /tmp if that fails?
There is also a bit of discussion on changing the behaviour of fscrypt to use EXDEV instead:
https:/ /github. com/google/ fscrypt/ issues/ 124
But why is Firefox using the /tmp folder in the first place, would it not be better to do a tmp file in the same folder to start with and then maybe fall back to /tmp if that fails?