(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #29)
> (In reply to Patrick McManus [:mcmanus] from comment #28)
> > Henrik, you can nom the patch for aurora if you think that's the right thing
> > to do. Do the tracking dance after there is a merged patch is kind of
> > redundant. Either we'll take it or we won't - there isn't much to track at
> > that point.
>
> Patrick, I would propose that you request for it given that you wrote the
> patch and know each and every detail to write up the right assessment for
> the flag.
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #29)
> (In reply to Patrick McManus [:mcmanus] from comment #28)
> > Henrik, you can nom the patch for aurora if you think that's the right thing
> > to do. Do the tracking dance after there is a merged patch is kind of
> > redundant. Either we'll take it or we won't - there isn't much to track at
> > that point.
>
> Patrick, I would propose that you request for it given that you wrote the
> patch and know each and every detail to write up the right assessment for
> the flag.
Patch nominations should definitely come from the bug assignee. If this risk outweighs the corner case described in https:/ /bugzilla. mozilla. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=849792# c29, we shouldn't take a fix at all.