As it stands, it's easier for lsb-release to be the canonical source and build os-release from it, rather than the other way around, at the package level. This is in the packaging rules itself; the difference is invisible to the end user.
Keeping lsb-release as the canonical source in the packaging for now.
As it stands, it's easier for lsb-release to be the canonical source and build os-release from it, rather than the other way around, at the package level. This is in the packaging rules itself; the difference is invisible to the end user.
Keeping lsb-release as the canonical source in the packaging for now.