Comment 3 for bug 1744762

Kyle, that missing "+" is just wrong, but it looks like it should work, if only incidentally, because "jub" is the core class of the query. I'm actually surprised that the in-list version doesn't work, but perhaps there is some subtle difference in the implicit-equals and the implicit-in-list code that's allowing the former to work in what amounts to an extra (useless) "AND" nesting but not the latter.

Bill, the lineitems_related_by_bib sub has been there since 2010 according to git-blame. You don't think the fix should be backported? It looks like a simple typo to me, in any case, right?.