Headings for staff catalog record views
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Following on the work from bug 1994711 to set heading 1 for all the staff pages, we now need to create subheadings to allow screen reader users to skip down the page to the appropriate section.
For the staff catalog single record view, I think "Record Summary" should be the H2, and each of the nav tabs should be H3. We don't have to change the way they look for now; they just need to be marked up as headings so they appear in screen reader users' page outline tools.
In the View Holds tab, the hold count is an H3 right now. This should change to H4 to maintain a sensible page outline. I think the only other tab that might need additional subheadings is Shelf View, where the card titles that are currently bold could be made H4 tags for extra structure.
summary: |
- Headings for staff catalog views + Headings for staff catalog record views |
description: | updated |
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | nobody → Stephanie Leary (stephanieleary) |
tags: | added: accessibility staffcatalog |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
milestone: | none → 3.12-beta |
tags: | added: signedoff |
Changed in evergreen: | |
assignee: | Terran McCanna (tmccanna) → nobody |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
I have added the subheadings, along with the necessary CSS to avoid major visual changes to font size, weight, line height, and whitespace.
Branch here: /git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/user/ sleary/ LP2039483- staffcat- subheadings
https:/
To test, you can either use a screen reader's page navigation tools or a browser extension that simulates the landmarks and headings list; I use SkipTo Landmarks and Navigation (screenshot attached).
Previously, only 1) Staff Catalog appeared in the headings list. It is now:
1) Staff Catalog
2) Record Summary
3) Staff View
3) Item Table
3) MARC Edit
3) MARC View
3) Record Notes
3) View Holds
3) Monograph Parts
3) Holdings View
3) Conjoined Items
3) Shelf Browse
4) FIC 220 @ BR4
4) FIC 220 @ BM1
4) [etc.]
Does it make sense to user a lower heading level for everything after Record Summary, or should I move Staff View, etc. up to the same level?