Comment 1 for bug 2025257

I wonder if the maximum PO name length belongs on the EDI attribute set in addition to or instead of the provider record.

Pro: having it be part of the attribute set means that it can be distributed in the seed data, since presumably the maximum length does not vary for a given provider and probably rarely changes
Con: would be more work as opposed to just adding a field to acq.provider, as the EDI attribute set mechanism would need to be taught that attributes are not just flags, but can have values