It seems that this patch disturbed the working of the 648-field. It worked perfectly before the patch was added. Now it has the same issue as the above mentioned fields in this bug report.
This is a screenshot from our log:
open-ils.pcrud 2023-03-20 11:26:02 [INFO:1712602:osrf_application.c:1075:16793079628061820] CALL: open-ils.pcrud open-ils.pcrud.search.acsbf.atomic "ANONYMOUS",{"tag":"648","authority_field":{"in":{"select":{"acsaf":["id"]},"from":"acsaf","where":{"heading_field":{"!=":null}}}}},{"flesh":1,"flesh_fields":{"acsbf":["authority_field"]}}
It seems that this patch disturbed the working of the 648-field. It worked perfectly before the patch was added. Now it has the same issue as the above mentioned fields in this bug report.
This is a screenshot from our log:
open-ils.pcrud 2023-03-20 11:26:02 [INFO:1712602: osrf_applicatio n.c:1075: 167930796280618 20] CALL: open-ils.pcrud open-ils. pcrud.search. acsbf.atomic "ANONYMOUS" ,{"tag" :"648", "authority_ field": {"in":{ "select" :{"acsaf" :["id"] },"from" :"acsaf" ,"where" :{"heading_ field": {"!=":null} }}}},{" flesh": 1,"flesh_ fields" :{"acsbf" :["authority_ field"] }}