Comment 7 for bug 2007351

Revision history for this message
Mieke Stroo (mst-iisg) wrote :

It seems that this patch disturbed the working of the 648-field. It worked perfectly before the patch was added. Now it has the same issue as the above mentioned fields in this bug report.

This is a screenshot from our log:

open-ils.pcrud 2023-03-20 11:26:02 [INFO:1712602:osrf_application.c:1075:16793079628061820] CALL: open-ils.pcrud open-ils.pcrud.search.acsbf.atomic "ANONYMOUS",{"tag":"648","authority_field":{"in":{"select":{"acsaf":["id"]},"from":"acsaf","where":{"heading_field":{"!=":null}}}}},{"flesh":1,"flesh_fields":{"acsbf":["authority_field"]}}