Comment 19 for bug 1931737
Revision history for this message
| Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) wrote | #19 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
This probably warrants its own bug, but I want to mention that while parallel ingest works now, it seems to be taking much longer with symspell enabled than with it disabled. I have a parallel ingest running for almost 3 days now, and it has completed 5 out of 228 batches. Normally by this point it would be over halfway done.
Checking the running batches of 10,000 records each, they've been running for 1 day and 5 hours.
I am only running 5 batches simultaneously, and I normally run 8. When running 8 on this setup, the batches of 10,000 usually finish in 4 to 6 hours.