Jane, I could imagine a future enhancement where we allow batches of records to be updated in a dry-run mode, where the modified records are returned to the UI, then the transaction is rolled back. Beyond that, I don't see any particular value in processing the records in monolithic transaction.
For now, I think it would be fine to assume per-record transactions and hide that option from the UI.
Jane, I could imagine a future enhancement where we allow batches of records to be updated in a dry-run mode, where the modified records are returned to the UI, then the transaction is rolled back. Beyond that, I don't see any particular value in processing the records in monolithic transaction.
For now, I think it would be fine to assume per-record transactions and hide that option from the UI.