Comment 17 for bug 1858448

Actually, Bill, I'd rather that you didn't make more changes. I've already setup a branch to test what you've done so far, and I'll have to redo that work. Though, I suppose there's no real harm at this point, since I have not run the modified DB upgrade that I came up with.

We also suspect that a change you have made to the IDL will need to be undone. I was going to supply more detail after we've had a hard look.

My initial reaction to Anna's comment that there is a requirement to age circulation, billing, and payment information on different schedules isn't possible given the current design of the money schema and the inheritance (or lack thereof) of some tables. The present design does not appear to be conducive to having different schedules based on what I see.

I'm actually off today, so won't go into a lot of detail right now. I'll wait to see what further changes Bill makes.