Combined Aged and Active Circulations Report Source not Exposed to Auto-Renewal Fields
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
3.2 |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
3.3 |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Evergreen 3.2.4
The circulation and aged_circulation tables both have new fields for auto_renewal and auto_renewal_
These fields are also available in the Circulation Report Source. The fields are not available, however, in the Aged (patronless) Circulation report source or the Combined Aged and Active Circulations report source.
It's imperative for especially the latter to have access to these fields. We have several report templates that count/list circulations by renewal type, and without access to the Auto Renewal field, there is no way to separate out auto-renewals.
We anonymize circulations after a set period, so the Circulation source will not always have complete data.
This makes it difficult to count initial circulations vs renewals.
This is also compounded by Bug #1835085, which currently sets both desk and auto renew to TRUE for auto-renewals.
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | none → 3.4-beta1 |
assignee: | nobody → Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.4-beta1 → 3.4-beta2 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 3.4-beta2 → 3.4-rc |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
This appears to be caused by the auto_renewal and auto_renewal_ remaining fields not being included in the IDL entries for acirc and combcirc.