Comment 15 for bug 1756142

Bill, that's interesting. I was beginning to wonder if there might be some regression lurking in here somewhere. Also, since there is no official way to link that I know of, putting a reference to bug #1754164 on here as well (copy location specific).

I also still wonder if we are dealing with two bugs, one the six second timeout, the other a too large response. The failures I have seen (when testing with srfsh) are more or less instant. It might just so happen that the same situation can stumble into both cases?