Comment 5 for bug 1753536

I can see changing the label to Owning Library and using the call number owning library as being viable. This feature could be more complicated, as the answer to whom should I call for more renewals is "it depends." This is something that we were asked to do as a local customization, but that I thought could have broader application in the community.

I wonder if the following would be in order:

1. Change the column header to "Owning Library."
2. Use the call number owning library.
3. Add an org unit setting to enable the display of this field.

Also, doing the above may complicate retrieving the URL for the link, but I will admit that I have not looked too closely at the code.

If the consensus is that this is a non-starter for community acceptance, we can always set the bug status to won't fix or invalid, and we can use it in-house.