The new copy visibility trigger was not taking into account a particular dataflow that is common to the serial checkin process. This branch addressed that case where the call number of a copy changes, requiring an update of one row on the cache table.
Here be a branch, me matey (day late, I know):
http:// git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/user/ miker/lp- 1718300- copy-vis- fix
From the commit:
The new copy visibility trigger was not taking into account a particular dataflow that is common to the serial checkin process. This branch addressed that case where the call number of a copy changes, requiring an update of one row on the cache table.