Comment 21 for bug 1712854

Revision history for this message
Kathy Lussier (klussier) wrote : Re: web client: Sorting for view record holds interface

Scott,
Is it critical enough that libraries would be willing to wait this long for the interface to load so that they could have sorting? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JArB98mpMfWlUYOrzNIY-bSvflCOUiBi/view

MassLNC has contracted with Equinox to find a way to sort these two interfaces without the huge hit on performance, but it may take a while until that work is done (certainly not in time for 3.1).

The question for now, then, is whether we want to push this code in the meantime to provide sorting. If we do, we're going to see a lot of wait time for loading these interfaces, which is equally frustrating for staff. I would prefer to wait until we have the improved sorting, and Terran has indicated a preference for waiting too. I would like to hear if others feel differently.

FWIW, I think the CSV workaround is more workable for the Browse Holds Shelf interface than for the Record Holds interface.