Comment 14 for bug 1712854
Revision history for this message
| Kathy Lussier (klussier) wrote Re: web client: Sorting for view record holds interface | #14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Adding a note that I saw similar issues with performance. I've been adding 178 holds to a record in the Concerto dataset for this testing. When I first tested the code back in December, it took about 20 seconds to load the holds on this record. When I tested with the new branch this morning, it took more than 40 seconds to load. Our top bestsellers are likely to have hundreds of holds on them, so the 178 holds on one title seems like a reasonable threshold to test.