Evergreen

  1. Bug #1676608
  2. Comment #38

Comment 38 for bug 1676608

Revision history for this message
Mike Rylander (mrylander) wrote :

Kathy,

IIUC, your goal is to suppress hold capture on any alert-forced "next status". Is that correct? If so, we can add the nocapture parameter to the subsequent override checking that applies the new status, and commit this. If it's more nuanced than that (say, it depends on what "next status" is) then I think we should LP that and get this in for 3.1, as Galen suggests.

Thoughts?