Evergreen

  1. Bug #1676608
  2. Comment #28

Comment 28 for bug 1676608

Revision history for this message
Galen Charlton (gmc) wrote : Re: [Bug 1676608] Re: Copy Alert Persistence and Suppression Matrix

> A question about (2) from your comment #24: ISTM that, as long as the
> copy's status is actually changed before going in transit, that's the
> best outcome; do you see the expected value in the transit's copy_status
> column after the copy is, in fact, in transit? If so, when it pops out
> on the other end of the transit, it will get the expected status and the
> next action (capture for hold, etc) will have to react appropriately.

I've confirmed that this is, in fact, how it's currently behaving.