Comment 6 for bug 1671856

I wanted to bring attention back to this bug to see if we can reach a decision on Bill's proposal. Although our libraries are all using the Prohibit Negative Balance settings, I can see where libraries that continue to use voiding would want the behavior to be consistent whenever a fine or fee is removed. With that in mind, I support the idea behind Bill's proposed change.

Although UI changes will help (we are very excited to see what they look like), but I think those could be done regardless of what happens with this branch. I also am not too concerned about one approach receiving less support than the other. Based on other discussions I've seen around negative balances, there seem to be a balanced mix of libraries in the community using both options.