While evaluating this for backporting to 2.10, I found that the patch had a (unintended?) side-effect: the 852$d now outputs the circ library's full name, not its description. The patch at the tip of the user/gmcharlt/lp1609556_code_for_circ_lib branch restores the previous behavior. I request that it be applied, as clients may rely on particular values in the 852$d.
While evaluating this for backporting to 2.10, I found that the patch had a (unintended?) side-effect: the 852$d now outputs the circ library's full name, not its description. The patch at the tip of the user/gmcharlt/ lp1609556_ code_for_ circ_lib branch restores the previous behavior. I request that it be applied, as clients may rely on particular values in the 852$d.