The problem with my earlier mock-up is that it assumes there are only a few bib records in the metarecord group. However, when you're working with a classic, like Great Expectations, you are likely to way too many titles in the group to display them well on a bib record. In fact, our largest metarecord group has 3,000+ records attached to it (a result of not including the parts subfields in the fingerprint).
Here is an alternate mock-up for how we would like to implement this feature.
The problem with my earlier mock-up is that it assumes there are only a few bib records in the metarecord group. However, when you're working with a classic, like Great Expectations, you are likely to way too many titles in the group to display them well on a bib record. In fact, our largest metarecord group has 3,000+ records attached to it (a result of not including the parts subfields in the fingerprint).
Here is an alternate mock-up for how we would like to implement this feature.
http:// masslnc. org/system/ files/u71/ repositioned- alternate- formats- editions. png
Rather than listing individual records, provide links to their format groups and language groups.