Comment 17 for bug 1559281

Revision history for this message
Galen Charlton (gmc) wrote :

I grant that it is borderline, but here's my reasoning: a cover images provider that supplies MARC records with the identifier required for an ILS to retrieve the images... has Evergreen refusing to hand it over, when an implementation that did not attempt to impose an ISBN validation requirement would have just worked. The patch itself is self-contained and present little backport risk.