Just adding a note that since Bob did not do a git sign-off for the code, he probably should declare a DCO here. Basically, since a sign-off on a branch implies that the developer has declared a developer's certificate of origin, when a developer has not done a sign-off, the DCO should explicitly stated.
Just adding a note that since Bob did not do a git sign-off for the code, he probably should declare a DCO here. Basically, since a sign-off on a branch implies that the developer has declared a developer's certificate of origin, when a developer has not done a sign-off, the DCO should explicitly stated.
Bob, you can add the DCO by copying and pasting the text at http:// wiki.evergreen- ils.org/ doku.php? id=dev: standing_ dco into a comment on this bug.
https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/evergreen/ +bug/578586 serves as an example of how this has been done in the past.