Comment 9 for bug 1527342

I like the idea of moving the reading history to a separate table.

However, a thought that occurred to me upon reading the bug (I've not looked at the code yet): two words I've not seen yet are "overdue fines". One person's "reading list" may be another person's "tool to track how much I'm 'donating' to the library" may be another person's "ammunition against the circulation desk if the 'my account' view doesn't match what I've been billed for".

That last use case might suggest including circ_lib and checkin_lib in the reading history. Emphasis on "might", however; I would be curious to hear from folks whether the reading history view gets invoked by patrons during disputes over overdue fines often enough to matter.